Risk Budget Management under a Factor Investment Framework: Theoretical Extension and Application in Target Volatility Strategies

Authors

  • Wenhao Mei School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/se5f3v86

Keywords:

Smart Beta, ESG, Asset Allocation, Risk Management.

Abstract

In recent years, China's stock market has transitioned between bear and bull markets. Smart Beta strategies combine the strengths of active and passive investing, effectively enhancing risk control and return generation capabilities in asset allocation. Although this strategy has achieved significant scale in foreign financial markets, fund products based on Smart Beta strategies remain relatively small in scale domestically. This study utilizes approximately five years of daily data (from 2021 to present) from representative indices of various style factors. Employing the sequential least squares algorithm, it constructs a four-factor portfolio combining low-correlation factors with strong risk-hedging capabilities and the green finance ESG factor—suitable for long-term development. This approach validates the limited scope of integrating ESG factors into asset allocation while determining the optimal weightings for this four-factor portfolio across different expected volatility ranges. The findings demonstrate that incorporating ESG factors can indeed optimize asset allocation outcomes. However, portfolio weights must be dynamically adjusted according to target volatility levels to achieve effective risk control capabilities during implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jin Zhou. Dynamic Timing Portfolio and Performance Evaluation of PGP-MVS Based on Smart Beta Strategies. 2025.

[2] Jan Lennartsson, Claes Ekman. Smart betas, return models and the tangency portfolio weights. PloS one, 2024, 19 (6): PPe0305736. DOI:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0305736.

[3] Silvasti Veikkopekka, Grobys Klaus, Äijö Janne. Is smart beta investing profitable? evidence from the Nordic stock market. Applied Economics, 2021, 53 (16): 1826-1839. DOI:10.1080/00036846.2020.1853669.

[4] Enping Yu, Zhongxin Ni. Can Corporate Green Transformation Under the “Dual Carbon” Goals Improve the Efficiency of Financial Asset Allocation?. 2025. DOI: 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2025.06.005.

[5] Yi Zhang. Product Design of Shenzhen Innovation ETF Based on ESG Principles and Smart Beta Strategy. 2025. DOI: 10.27415/d.cnki.gxngc.2024.001677.

[6] Xiaoyu Zhu. ETF Product Design Based on ESG Principles and Smart Beta Strategies. 2024. DOI: 10.27151/d.cnki.ghnlu.2022.003682.

[7] Peng Zhang, Ziqing Miao, Shisen Liu, Haohan Wang. Seeking Green Premiums: The Investment Feasibility of ESG Factors in China's A-Share Market. Economics and Management Sciences, 2024. DOI: 10.20134/j.cnki.fmr.2024.07.002.

[8] Blitz, David. The Cross-Section of Factor Returns. JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO. MANAGEMENT, JAN, 2024.

[9] Jiaxiang Liu, Algorithmic Research on SmartBeta Factor Selection. 2025. DOI: 10.27338/d.cnki.gsjmu.2022.001072.

[10] Yefei Gu. Daily Net Asset Value Calculation for Funds Based on the SLSQP Algorithm Position Measurement Model. Basic Sciences; Economics and Management Sciences, 2025. DOI: 10.27312/d.cnki.gshsu.2025.002463.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2025

How to Cite

Mei, W. (2025). Risk Budget Management under a Factor Investment Framework: Theoretical Extension and Application in Target Volatility Strategies. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 156-167. https://doi.org/10.54097/se5f3v86