The Impact of Personalized Recommendation Algorithms on Consumers' Purchasing Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ywjcsq19Keywords:
E-commerce platforms, big data, personalized algorithms, consumer psychology.Abstract
Against the backdrop of ubiquitous big data and algorithmic mediation, recommender systems have become the dominant channel through which consumers discover products and form preferences. As artificial intelligence advances and platform economies expand, algorithmic recommendations now permeate every stage of digital consumption, reconfiguring the interactions among users, goods, and marketplaces. On e-commerce platforms in particular, personalized recommender systems serve not only as engines of conversion but also as subtle architects of decision paths and preference structures. The present study combines survey evidence with click-stream data to examine the causal impact of these systems on purchase behavior. Results indicate that algorithmic recommendations significantly increase click-through and purchase intentions, yet tension persists between accuracy and diversity. Users exhibit a calculated trade-off—surrendering a degree of control in exchange for cognitive efficiency. Drawing on questionnaire responses and secondary click data from Taobao, the paper underscores the need for governance frameworks that balance commercial effectiveness with user autonomy.
Downloads
References
[1] Jiang X Z, Gao S. Intelligent clustering for personalized recommendation of digital library texts. Wireless Internet Technology, 2025, 22 (2): 107-111.
[2] Zheng X W. Research and implementation of a multi-objective personalized tourism service recommendation system. Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2015.
[3] Hu H X, Jin C P. Personalized training in the age of intelligence: advances in machine-learning applications and a digital future. Sports Science Research, 2021, 35 (4): 9-19.
[4] Cosley D, Lam S K, Albert I, et al. Seeing what you want to see: how collaborative filtering can influence user behavior. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003.
[5] Pariser E. The filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press, 2011.
[6] Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Zhang Y, et al. Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 2021, 592 (6): 590-595.
[7] Fang X Z. Chi-square distribution and chi-square test. China Statistics, 2022, 16 (5): 29-31.
[8] Lin Y D, Wang W Y. Influencing factors of emotional distress among vocational college students: an analysis based on chi-square tests and countermeasures. Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College, 2024, 34 (4): 1-6.
[9] Hector M, Rubesh M, Leighton E, et al. Emotional and Cognitive Landscape of Perceived Risk: Anxiety, Caution, and Financial Loss in Shaping Safety Decisions Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2025.
[10] Lambert C M, Epstein H M, Cullinan D. Diagnostic Utility of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance-3 Screener for Elementary School Students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2025, 43 (7): 743-754.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







