Operational Strategy in the Musical Instruments Industry: A Case Study of Yamaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0dtwd237Keywords:
daniel.liu.sugarcane@gmail.comAbstract
The global musical instrument market has experienced an upturn and downturn during the pandemic, with high channel inventories and uneven recovery. Demand recovery is asymmetric across regions and product lines, prolonging dealer destocking and widening supply–demand cadence mismatches. This paper takes the listed company Yamaha as an example, based on recent financial reports and management statements, to sort out the business structure and analyze around three topics: "inventory rhythm", "demographic structure", and "digital ecosystem". The results show that the musical instrument sector is held back by inventory reduction, while B2B audio and exchange rates offset nominal revenue. "Make-to-order" and "small-batch quick return" can improve turnover, and "30-60-90-day" milestones and community activities can enhance retention and upgrades. One-click course export to creation/stage presets can reduce cross-platform friction. This paper provides an actionable roadmap for listed companies, offering guidance for manufacturers and investors on strategic choices and stock price focus in the post-pandemic stage.
Downloads
References
[1] Yamaha Corporation. Briefing on consolidated financial results for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024 (FY2024.3). Retrieved from https://global.yamaha.com/en/ir/presentations/pdf/2024/pres-240508e.pdf, last accessed 2025/10/9.
[2] Yamaha Corporation. Briefing on consolidated financial results for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025 (FY2025.3). Retrieved from https://global.yamaha.com/en/ir/presentations/pdf/2025/pres-250508e.pdf, last accessed 2025/10/9.
[3] Yamaha Corporation. Reorganization for piano production system. Retrieved from https://global.yamaha.com/en/news/2025/25020501/, last accessed 2025/10/9.
[4] Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Science, 1997, 43(4): 546-558.
[5] Verhoef P C, Kannan P K, Inman J J. From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 2015, 91(2): 174-181.
[6] Wieser M, Novak-Geiger V, Muller F H. Who stays? Who goes? Motivation and tendency to drop out in music schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15: 1378843.
[7] Pitts S E, Robinson K. Dropping in and dropping out: Experiences of sustaining and ceasing amateur participation in classical music. British Journal of Music Education, 2016, 33(3): 327-346.
[8] Ruth N, Mullensiefen D. Survival of musical activities: When do young people stop making music. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16(11): e0259105.
[9] Kruse N B, Harlos S C, Callahan R M, et al. Skype music lessons in the academy: Intersections of music education, applied music and technology. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 2013, 6(1): 43-60.
[10] Creech A, Hallam S, Varvarigou M, et al. Active music making: A route to enhanced subjective well-being among older people. Perspectives in Public Health, 2013, 133(1): 36-43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
