Financial Analysis and Countermeasures for Platforms in the Intense Takeout Competition: A Comparative Study of Meituan and JD.com
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/pym5ff27Keywords:
Takeout competition; financial analysis; bilateral market theory; financial risk theory.Abstract
With the continuous development of electronic technology and the acceleration of people’s daily life pace, the food delivery business has been continuously improving. Numerous food delivery merchants and platforms have sprung up in the market like mushrooms. Over the past decade, among the numerous food delivery platforms, two of them, Meituan and Eleme, have formed a duopoly situation, occupying the majority of the market share. In early 2025, with JD.com announcing its entry into the food delivery field, an unprecedented food delivery competition began. Various huge subsidies and discounts have been launched one after another. Therefore, how to play to one’s strengths and avoid weaknesses to be in the lead of the competition is an issue that needs to be studied. This article will conduct an exploration of this issue based on the bilateral market theory and the financial risk theory, using data analysis and comparison as well as case analysis. Through the research process of this article, it can be found that the subsidies of the two platforms are not symmetrical, and the financial risk exposures they generate also vary. Moreover, due to its well-developed dispatching system, JD.com's logistics is more efficient. Therefore, the following conclusion is if enterprises want to gain an advantageous position in the competition, they must reasonably balance subsidies and financial risk exposure to maximize profits. At the same time, the integration and development of the logistics system and artificial intelligence should be emphasized to enhance the efficiency of the material distribution system.
Downloads
References
[1] Gao Yuqian. Research on Pricing Strategies of China's Food Delivery O2O Platforms from the Perspective of Bilateral Market Theory (Master's Thesis, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences). 2020.
[2] Liu Minjian, Du Shaofu, Nie Tengfei. Insurance policy and pricing decisions in online food delivery market with consumer ratings. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2025, 70: 101474.
[3] Rattawut Nivornusit, Tanpat Kraiwanit, Pongsakorn Limna. Food delivery competition in the digital economy: Price war strategy in a developing country. Digital Business, 2024, 4(1): 100076.
[4] Arnab Chakraborty, Nitin Kumar, Mamta Chawla, et al. Understanding the Drivers of Continued Use of Online Food Delivery Platforms among Indian Consumers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2024, 79(2): 271-288.
[5] Liyuwork Mitiku Dana, Belinda A Morley, Zenobia M Talati, et al. Consumers’ Food Choice Drivers When Ordering Meals From Online Food Delivery Platforms: Latent Profile Analysis. Current Developments in Nutrition, 2025, 9(S2): 106642.
[6] Wang Mingjun, Zhou Lele, Suh Woojong. The Impact of Service Convenience in Online Food Delivery Apps on Consumer Behavior in the Chinese Market: The Moderating Roles of Coupon Proneness and Online Reviews. Systems, 2025, 13(8): 647.
[7] Wang Junbin, Shen Xiangdong, Huang Xinbei, et al. Influencing Factors of the Continuous Usage Intention of Consumers of Online Food Delivery Platform Based on an Information System Success Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 716796.
[8] Chen Yangyuan. The take-away shopping hot "fever" at the beginning of the conflict between merchants and platform. The First Financial Daily, 2025-07-23: A01.
[9] Lu Han. The platform in the second quarter net profit fell broken take-out war. The First Financial Daily, 2025-08-28: A01.
[10] Huber. Take-out wars: financial perspective how to broken. China's Accounting Report, 2025-08-08: 001.
[11] Zhong Zhengkuan. What hidden concerns lie behind the "subsidy war" in the food delivery industry and the price frenzy?. Daily, Shaoguan, 2025-07-23: A06.
[12] Sofía Pérez de Guzmán Padrón, Amparo Serrano Pascual, Marcela Iglesias Onofrio. The active production of consent for employment precarity and the euphemisation of coercion in platform economies: The case of food delivery riders. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2024, 45(4): 1040-1066.
[13] Lin Yuji. Status Quo and Countermeasures of Labor Rights Protection in New Forms of Employment: A Case Study of Food Delivery Workers. Scientific and Social Research, 2025, 7(4): 282-288.
[14] Wang Yue, Coe Neil M. Platform ecosystems and digital innovation in food retailing: Exploring the rise of Hema in China. Geoforum, 2021, 126: 310-321.
[15] Meituan. Performance Announcement for the three Months ended March 31, 2025. 2025.
[16] JD.com. JD.com Announces First Quarter 2025 Results. 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







