Explore the Relationship Between Financial Information Transparency and Corporate Governance Efficiency

Authors

  • Donghao Fan School of Business, Zhuhai College of Science and Technology, Zhuhai, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/zvmkr734

Keywords:

Financial, transparency, corporate governance.

Abstract

Under the current environment of China's capital market, the relationship between financial information transparency and corporate governance efficiency is a practical research point. Based on principal-agent theory, this study first conducts a literature review to sort out the framework of financial information transparency and principal-agent theory. Using Sinopec Group as an example, the various measures to enhance financial information transparency are compared with Kangmei Pharmaceutical and the relationship between the transparency of financial information and the efficiency of corporate governance is analysed. The results show that improving financial information transparency significantly impacts corporate governance efficiency. Simultaneously, improving corporate governance efficiency can also promote the optimisation of financial information transparency. Finally, this study analyses the paths to enhance financial information transparency and the impact on all stakeholders after the improvement of corporate governance efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shang, Chen, H. Supply chain transparency and corporate financial fraud[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 77: 107070.

[2] Jiang, W. Corporate ESG performance, information transparency and financial performance[J]. Finance, 2024, 14(3): 763-776.

[3] Dai, S. H. Equity concentration, internal control effectiveness and accounting information transparency[J]. Electronic Business Review, 2024, 13(2): 1014-1021.

[4] Salikhova, T., Ugarov, A., Orlova, S. Dividend smoothing and financial transparency[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024: 105152.

[5] Ross, S. A. The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem[J]. American Economic Review, 1973, 63(2): 134-139.

[6] Zhu, N., Yang, Z., Hu, Y. Optimal ownership and capital structure with agency conflicts[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Advance online publication.

[7] Garcia, A. S., Lee, J. H. ESG disclosure, financial transparency and agency costs: Evidence from global firms[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2023, 156: 107023.

[8] Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

[9] Rui, W. Q. Digitalization of family businesses and construction of internal control environment: A case study of financial fraud in Kangmei Pharmaceutical[J]. Electronic Business Review, 2024, 13(4): 5882-5888.

[10] Du, Y. F. Research on the impact of accounting system reform in administrative institutions and public institutions on financial work[J]. Forefront of Economic Management, 2025, 1(1): 78-82.

[11] Smith, J., Johnson, L. Corporate transparency and digitalization: The role of AI in financial reporting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Advance online publication.

[12] China Securities Regulatory Commission. Letter on the reply to proposal No. 02539 (No. 163 in the category of Finance, Taxation and Finance) of the Fifth Session of the 13th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference[Z]. 2023.

[13] Kim, S., Li, Z. The effects of mandatory disclosure reforms on corporate transparency[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research. Advance online publication.

[14] Li, X. J., Xiao, S. F., Wang, X. Y. Investor protection effect of investor service center's participation in shareholders' meeting[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 25(2): 146-166.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2025

How to Cite

Fan, D. (2025). Explore the Relationship Between Financial Information Transparency and Corporate Governance Efficiency. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 238-245. https://doi.org/10.54097/zvmkr734