Research on the Intercultural Leadership of Chinese Enterprises Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Theory

Authors

  • Hang Fu School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, China, 710128
  • Ke Mi School of Business, Xi'an International Studies University, Xi'an, China, 710128

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0pqhtn93

Keywords:

Intercultural Leadership, Chinese Enterprises, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Theory.

Abstract

As Chinese enterprises expand globally, their leaders face significant challenges due to cultural differences. These differences in communication styles, management expectations, and work values can lead to misunderstandings and inefficiencies, necessitating the development of intercultural leadership capabilities. This paper explores the impact of cultural differences on the global leadership of Chinese enterprises and proposes corresponding strategies. Using Hofstede’s cultural dimension theory as the theoretical foundation, the study analyzes how Chinese enterprises can adapt their leadership approaches to different cultural contexts. The findings indicate that Chinese enterprises can enhance their global leadership effectiveness by understanding and adapting to cultural differences. However, it is crucial to be aware of the limitations of cultural theories and continuously innovate to adapt to the evolving cultural landscape. The future demand for intercultural leaders is expected to increase, and intercultural leadership will become an increasingly valuable asset. The study suggests that Chinese enterprises should integrate traditional wisdom with modern innovation to develop unique leadership styles. They should also focus on cultivating cultural intelligence among employees and creating inclusive organizational cultures to support their global operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Y., Li J. Cultural Intelligence as a Moderator in Cross-Cultural Leadership: Evidence from Chinese MNCs[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2022, 89: 234–245.

[2] Wang L., Zhang M., Huang Y. Leadership Effectiveness in Sino-African Joint Ventures: The Role of Power Distance Orientation[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2023, 54(3): 312–329.

[3] Zhang Q., Liu H. Uncertainty Avoidance and Transformational Leadership: A Study of Chinese Managers in Southeast Asia[J]. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2021, 27(4): 521–538.

[4] Sun R., Zhou X. Hybrid Leadership in Chinese MNCs: A Case Study of Huawei in Germany[J]. Journal of International Management, 2024, 30(1): 100987.

[5] Xu Y., Peng L. Developing Intercultural Leadership Competence: Longitudinal Evidence from China[J]. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2022, 33(2): 189–208.

[6] Li M., Luo J. Inclusive Leadership and Cross-Cultural Team Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Climate[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2023, 44(5): 687–703.

[7] Zhao W., Chen X., Wang T. Dynamic Cultural Framing in Global Leadership: A Cognitive Approach[J]. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 2025, 44(2): 45–57.

[8] Liu Y., Li B. Emotional Intelligence and Intercultural Leadership: A Study of Chinese Expatriates[J]. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2022, 15(1): 45–60.

[9] Huang S., Zhang J. Cultural Hybridity and Leadership Adaptation: Chinese Firms in Europe[J]. European Management Journal, 2024, 42(3): 432–445.Fan Wei. Exploring and Verifying the Structural Dimensions of Cultural Integration Ability of Global Leaders [D]. Jiangxi:Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2018.

[10] Guo P., Xu H. Cross-Cultural Leadership Development in Chinese Enterprises: Challenges and Strategies[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2023, 20(6): 45–52.

Downloads

Published

08-01-2026

How to Cite

Fu, H., & Mi, K. (2026). Research on the Intercultural Leadership of Chinese Enterprises Based on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 538-546. https://doi.org/10.54097/0pqhtn93